Disclosure of the intention to compete with employer?

Book your free initial call

    We endeavour to make an initial response to all enquiries within 24 hours but please be aware that on some occasions due to prior commitments or volume of calls we will not be able to respond in that time frame. We also operate a 48 hour return policy. This return policy means that if we have not responded with 48 hours of your initial enquiry we are unable to do so due to current workloads and we will destroy your data accordingly. This policy ensures you are not left waiting and have the certainty that your data is not compromised. In most instances however we are able to make contact within a 24 hour time frame. Please note our free initial advice service is available to clients at our total discretion and if your case is of a complex nature we may not be able to offer you a free consultation. However in these instances we will advise you what the charge would be for an initial fixed fee consultation.
  • (view our privacy statement)
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Chancery Division in the case of MPT Group v Peel held it is probably not necessary for employees to disclose their intention to compete with their employer.

In this case two fairly senior employees planned to set up a new company in competition with their employer once their restrictive covenants had expired post employment. The employees handed in their resignation and were not honest about their future work intentions when questioned by their employer in this regard. The employer sought an injunction on misuse of confidential information and a breach of the duty to answer questions truthfully.

The judge held that although there was a general duty to answer questions truthfully he was ‘reluctant to hold’ that a departing employee is under any contractual obligation to disclose his own confidential plans to set up in lawful competition.

It is, however, worth noting that a different conclusion may have been reached should the employees have been senior enough to owe fiduciary duties to the employer.

Written by
Edward Aston
13th June 2017