Importance of Decision Marker’s Reason for Dismissing

Book your free initial call

    We endeavour to make an initial response to all enquiries within 24 hours but please be aware that on some occasions due to prior commitments or volume of calls we will not be able to respond in that time frame. We also operate a 48 hour return policy. This return policy means that if we have not responded with 48 hours of your initial enquiry we are unable to do so due to current workloads and we will destroy your data accordingly. This policy ensures you are not left waiting and have the certainty that your data is not compromised. In most instances however we are able to make contact within a 24 hour time frame. Please note our free initial advice service is available to clients at our total discretion and if your case is of a complex nature we may not be able to offer you a free consultation. However in these instances we will advise you what the charge would be for an initial fixed fee consultation.
  • (view our privacy statement)
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Initially, the Employment Tribunal (ET) upheld Mr Mohammed’s claims for discrimination arising from disability and unfair dismissal against ummins Limited. The claims arose from Mr Mohamed going away to Pakistan during a period when Cummins had instigated disciplinary proceedings against him. Mr Mohamed was dismissed in his absence.

Cummins appealed against the ET’s decision. Some of the grounds of appeal (among others) were that the ET had not properly determined the reason for dismissal, it substituted its own decision for that of the employer and failed to determine the specific nature of the misconduct Cummins found Mr Mohammed was guilty of and whether it was reasonable to consider this misconduct.

The decision of the EAT can be found here Cummins Ltd v Mr W Mohammed UKEAT/0039/20/OO . The EAT upheld the appeal and remitted the case to be reheard by a new tribunal.

This case serves as a reminder that the Employment Tribunal should assess the decision maker’s reason for dismissing an employee and not make assumptions about this. Employers are well advised to keep a clear audit trail as to what leads to such decisions being made.

Astons Solicitors
7th June 2021