Christian Preaching and Discrimination

Book your free initial call

    We endeavour to make an initial response to all enquiries within 24 hours but please be aware that on some occasions due to prior commitments or volume of calls we will not be able to respond in that time frame. We also operate a 48 hour return policy. This return policy means that if we have not responded with 48 hours of your initial enquiry we are unable to do so due to current workloads and we will destroy your data accordingly. This policy ensures you are not left waiting and have the certainty that your data is not compromised. In most instances however we are able to make contact within a 24 hour time frame. Please note our free initial advice service is available to clients at our total discretion and if your case is of a complex nature we may not be able to offer you a free consultation. However in these instances we will advise you what the charge would be for an initial fixed fee consultation.
  • (view our privacy statement)
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ms Wasteney was issued with a formal warning after complaints were made by a junior colleague of Muslim faith about her behaviour. The allegations included Ms Wasteney praying with the colleague, the laying on of hands, giving the colleague a book which concerned conversion to Christianity of a Muslim woman and inviting the Muslim colleague to various services and events at Ms Wasteney’s church.

Having been issued with a formal warning for serious misconduct for blurring of professional boundaries and subjecting the junior colleague to improper pressure and unwanted conduct, Ms Wasteney claimed direct discrimination and harassment because of/related to her religion or belief.

After the Employment Tribunal rejected these claims, she appealed. The Employment Appeal Tribunal agreed that there had been no such discrimination.

The EAT drew a distinction between merely manifesting a religious belief and improperly promoting religious belief in a way that was not consensual. Ms Waveney had also alleged that she was disciplined for acts that were protected by Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights – the right to manifest her religious belief. This argument also failed.

Case reference – Wasteney v East London NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0157/15

Written by
Rachael Jessop
11th April 2016