Supreme Court in the case of Chief Constable of Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew

Book your free initial call

    We endeavour to make an initial response to all enquiries within 24 hours but please be aware that on some occasions due to prior commitments or volume of calls we will not be able to respond in that time frame. We also operate a 48 hour return policy. This return policy means that if we have not responded with 48 hours of your initial enquiry we are unable to do so due to current workloads and we will destroy your data accordingly. This policy ensures you are not left waiting and have the certainty that your data is not compromised. In most instances however we are able to make contact within a 24 hour time frame. Please note our free initial advice service is available to clients at our total discretion and if your case is of a complex nature we may not be able to offer you a free consultation. However in these instances we will advise you what the charge would be for an initial fixed fee consultation.
  • (view our privacy statement)
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Employees can now seek compensation for past underpayments of holiday pay even if there are intervals of over three months between the underpayments (i.e. deductions).

This was the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Chief Constable of Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew.

The claimants, comprising of over 3,000 police officers and civilian staff in Northern Ireland, argued for compensation due to only receiving ‘basic pay’ instead of ‘normal pay’, which encompasses basic pay, overtime, and various allowances. Although both sides agreed there was an underpayment including compulsory overtime the Supreme Court was tasked with determining how far back the claimants could make their claim.

The relevant Northern Irish legislation, reflecting the Employment Rights Act 1996, specifies that claims can only address payments from the three months preceding the claim’s submission. However, if the deductions form a series, they can be combined if the claim is filed within three months of the final deduction in the series.

In Bear Scotland v Fulton, the EAT had earlier determined that deductions could be connected in a series only if the interval between each deduction was three months or shorter. This clearly limited the period for which Claimants could retrospectively claim holiday pay.

In the latest Supreme Court decision, the Court determined that whilst claims for holiday pay still need to made within three months of the last deduction a claim can be made for a series of deduction even where the intervals between the deductions are more than three months.

The Court highlighted that using a fixed 12 week period to compute holiday pay was not correct and instead, the period should be specific to each individual, reflecting their specific work routine. The Court recommended a more practical approach where “normal pay” calculations are based on averages from the preceding 12 months before leave.

It is important to note that the repercussions of this ruling are lessened for employers since claims for unauthorised wage deductions under the Employment Rights Act 1996 are restricted to deductions over the previous two years only.

Written by
Astons Solicitors