Employee Shareholder Status – Commons overrules Lords

Book your free initial call

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Our 72 Hour Return Policy*
We endeavour to make an initial response to all enquiries within 24 hours but please be aware that on some occasions due to prior commitments or volume of calls we will not be able to respond in that time frame. We also operate a 72 hour return policy. This return policy means that if we have not responded with 72 hours of your initial enquiry we are unable to do so due to current workloads and we will destroy your data accordingly. This policy ensures you are not left waiting and have the certainty that your data is not compromised. In most instances however we are able to make contact within a 24 hour time frame. Please note our free initial advice service is available to clients at our total discretion and if your case is of a complex nature we may not be able to offer you a free consultation. However in these instances we will advise you what the charge would be for an initial fixed fee consultation.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Despite the majority of the House of Lords recently voting against the proposals relating to employee shareholders, it is being reported on Twitter and elsewhere, that yesterday afternoon, the House of Commons voted in favour of creating a new “Employee Shareholder” status by reinstating clause 27 of the Growth and Infrastructure Bill.

An employee shareholder will receive shares worth at least £2,000 in their employer Company, in exchange for giving up certain employment rights, including the right to claim unfair dismissal and the right to a statutory redundancy payment.

The first £2,000 of shares will be tax free and any monies not exceeding £50,000 on those shares will be exempt from capital gains tax when the shares are sold. Details of how the shares will be valued on buy-back or sale are to follow.

It is viewed by some commentators as a “bully’s charter” and a way of enabling employers to avoid costly compromise agreements by effectively “buying out” employment rights at the outset.

Written by Edward Aston

17th April 2013