Height Requirement for the Police is Indirectly Discriminatory against Women

Book your free initial call

    We endeavour to make an initial response to all enquiries within 24 hours but please be aware that on some occasions due to prior commitments or volume of calls we will not be able to respond in that time frame. We also operate a 48 hour return policy. This return policy means that if we have not responded with 48 hours of your initial enquiry we are unable to do so due to current workloads and we will destroy your data accordingly. This policy ensures you are not left waiting and have the certainty that your data is not compromised. In most instances however we are able to make contact within a 24 hour time frame. Please note our free initial advice service is available to clients at our total discretion and if your case is of a complex nature we may not be able to offer you a free consultation. However in these instances we will advise you what the charge would be for an initial fixed fee consultation.
  • (view our privacy statement)
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Greek government have a regulation which imposes a minimum height requirement for joining the police of 170cm. This minimum requirement is the same for both men and women so should this be considered indirect discrimination?

In Ypourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton v Kalliri the CJEU held that, yes, this would be considered unjustifiable indirect discrimination. The Greek court had initially found that the height requirement was indirectly discriminatory towards women and the CJEU held that it was not justifiable as height does not necessarily mean that a person is physically capable or incapable to do the job. It suggested that candidates could be tested specifically for their physical ability rather than given a height limit and, subject to the findings of the Greek court, held that the regulation was unjustified.

Written by

Rachael Jessop
2nd November 2018