Is suspension considered breach of contract?

Book your free initial call

    We endeavour to make an initial response to all enquiries within 24 hours but please be aware that on some occasions due to prior commitments or volume of calls we will not be able to respond in that time frame. We also operate a 48 hour return policy. This return policy means that if we have not responded with 48 hours of your initial enquiry we are unable to do so due to current workloads and we will destroy your data accordingly. This policy ensures you are not left waiting and have the certainty that your data is not compromised. In most instances however we are able to make contact within a 24 hour time frame. Please note our free initial advice service is available to clients at our total discretion and if your case is of a complex nature we may not be able to offer you a free consultation. However in these instances we will advise you what the charge would be for an initial fixed fee consultation.
  • (view our privacy statement)
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Was there a breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in the suspension of a teacher?

In Agoreyo v London Borough of Lambeth the High Court held that yes there was a breach. A teacher had been suspended due to force used with two children to remove them from a class. At the time she was not asked to give a response to the allegation and no alternative to suspension was given. The teacher then resigned the same day.

The Judge held that suspension in this situation was not a neutral act, following Mezey and Gogay. The statutory guidance for local authorities was taken into account and it was noted that acting on impulse should be avoided and that suspension should not be the default position. The suspension was not given on the grounds of child protection but to “allow the investigation to be conducted fairly”.

It was concluded by the Court that in this case suspension had been adopted as the default position and was acting on impulse, which, in turn, amounted to a fundamental breach of contract.

Written by

Edward Aston
5th September 2017